There’s a line from a song that’s been going through my mind while preparing this post. It’s by Band of Horses.

Born in the Bible Belt/ Nothing gets me hotter than
Yanking on a belt that's undone
When it comes to blogs that are Bible Belt themed, the term “Bible Belt” is often a point of reference the bloggist uses to measure a difference of opinion or identity.
Frank Lockwood’s “spirituality blog” on biblebeltblogger.com brings critical appreciation to religious happenings. While a recent post rips on marketed products of televangelists, elsewhere Lockwood highlights the quest of two Muslim men visiting 30 mosques in 30 days. Should I have been surprised to see this referenced in a blog primarily dedicated to Christian beurocracy?
Lockwood’s news blurbs inform through subtlety. Mike Huckabee’s trip to the Holy Land scheduled for next year is framed with comments about the expense of such an undertaking. It’s as if the bloggist can’t help admitting the absurdity taking place in in the name of something he cares about, Christianity.
I knew better than to look at mainstream news sources to find the pulse of Bible Belt blogging, but two articles from CNN.com’s Belief Blog proved too rich a resource to ignore. Every story viewed traditional perspectives of religion critically. By claiming that many people who quote the Bible are in fact misquoting it, “Actually, that’s not in the Bible” hints strongly that people who find comfort in the existence of a Holy Book aren’t even familiar with what they supposedly revere.
“Documentarians shed light on Pint-sized preachers” covers the attempt of British filmmakers to document a phenomenon. The writer quotes the creators , “I think our audience will be quite jaw-dropped by this phenomenon.” It’s as if Americans have been reveling in too much religious freedom since leaving England in the 17th century.
CNN’s Belief Blog relies on critiquing majority religion and highlighting the marginalized for the sake of news, and I completely understand that. But if it weren’t for the quirks of the religiously fervent, what flavor would we have in that aspect of culture?
One bloggist documents in bowdenblog.wordpress.com a series titled “Living as a missionary in the Bible Belt.” In a recent post, the writer cites several ways to distinguish true religion amongst the religiosity of the South. What he is looking for are ways a church-goer embodies truth as given by the gospel-writers in the New Testament, as opposed to the “watered down placebo wrapped in fancy packaging” of mainstream religion.
The essay was important because it helped separate those who wish to live outside of common-denominator religion in the Southeast. Many find it difficult to follow a higher road than their neighbors, just as it was for Jesus to do in his day.
One of the notorious trademarks of Bible-belt religion is the lack of concern for the politically correct, such as when this bloggist uses the phrase “false doctrines as well as cults.” What this often implies is that even when people look and talk like us, it might not be the right looking and talking, and therefore their beliefs are doing more damage than good.
How does one accomplish being PC while remaining religious? By depicting yourself as a religious minority. I was lucky to find two cases of this.
A hilarious momblog of colorful happenings, mormongirlinthebiblebelt.blogspot.com says it all in the title. “Mormon” and “Bible Belt,” though both religious terms, often do not make it into the same sentence. Looking what the aforementioned Bible Belt missionary says about cults gives us a picture of why this is the case.
For an even stranger pairing, there is a blog that goes by the name Biblebeltbalabusta, a dedication to teaching Jewishness to children. Thus the blog is filled with pictures of conglomerations of popular culture and Judaism.
Again the title intrigued me, for this balabusta--like the missionary and Mormon bloggists--were using the term “Bible Belt” as a reference point to explain how estranged they were from the cultural norm. Why is that necessary? It seems to me that none of us wish to be associated with mainstream Biblebeltlandia. It is a wasteland where good things die or flee to live in the margins.
I wouldn’t go so far as to say the existence of the Bible Belt is damaging in the way CNN might approach it. I think it’s natural for religious majorities to become lax and for free-thinking individuals to label themselves based on how removed they are from the norm. Perhaps the Bible Belt isn’t a reality in the way we depict it, but only a way of pointing the finger at how other people act.
For as long as we’re ahead of someone else, we’re good, right?
Featured Blogs
1) Biblebeltblogger.com
2) CNN Belief Blog
3) Bowdenblog.wordpress.com
4) Mormongirlinthebiblebelt.blogspot.com
5) Biblebeltbalabusta.wordpress.comThis
